He GQ, Yu CY, Xu BY, Dai LY, Li YJ, Liu CY, Diao JP. Incidence, risk factors, and correlation with organ involvement of psychological disorders in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(7): 120249 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.120249]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
I would like to express my sincere appreciation to all editorial staff, peer reviewers and production team of World Journal of Psychiatry for their careful work during the publication of my manuscript.
First of all, the journal boasts high academic credibility and a standardized, user-friendly submission and publishing system. The whole peer review procedure was fair, efficient and well-organized. The peer reviewers put forward detailed, professional and enlightening revision suggestions, which effectively helped me optimize the research design, argument logic and academic expression of my paper. Meanwhile, editors gave timely replies and patient guidance whenever I had questions during the revision and production phases, making the entire publishing process smooth and reassuring.
In addition, the service efficiency of the language editing and production team is impressive, which guaranteed the rapid online publication of my manuscript. I hold full trust in the academic quality and operation standardization of World Journal of Psychiatry. I will definitely recommend this journal to my colleagues and fellow researchers, and I am willing to choose this journal again for my subsequent academic achievements.